Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Wiseman et al. v. Massachusetts et al., 1970 — 400 U.S. 954 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Wiseman et al. v. Massachusetts et al.
400 U.S. 954·Supreme Court of the United States·1970
Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Brennan, and Mr. Justice Blackmun are of the opinion that the petition should be granted. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 621,
October Term, 1969.
Wiseman et al. v. Massachusetts et al.,
[MAJORITY]
398 U. S. 960. Motion of National Educational Television for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae in support of petition for rehearing granted. Petition for rehearing denied.
Mr. Justice Harlan, Mr. Justice Brennan, and Mr. Justice Blackmun are of the opinion that the petition should be granted. Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion and petition.