Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Killian v. United States, 1961 — 365 U.S. 810 · caselaw · US
General
Killian v. United States
365 U.S. 810·Supreme Court of the United States·1961
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 141.
Killian v. United States.
M. Michael Essin and Basil R. Pollitt for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Yeagley and George B. Searls for the United States.
[MAJORITY]
C, A. 7th Cir. Certiorari granted, limited to Questions 3 and 6 presented by the petition, which read as follows:
“3. Whether instructions to the jury properly defined membership in and affiliation to the Communist Party.
“6. Whether the production of statements which report payments to those witnesses, as informers, is excused after a complete foundation for their production under 18 U. S. Code § 3500 is laid, when all that the government has offered to produce at trial is a list of the amounts and dates of payments and there is no evidence as to what other facts are reported in those statements.”