Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward Hodnett, Appellant, 1895 — 146 N.Y. 378 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward Hodnett, Appellant
146 N.Y. 378·New York Court of Appeals·1895·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Edward Hodnett, Appellant.
(Argued April 22, 1895;
decided May 3, 1895.)
Appeal- from order of the General Term of the Supreme Oourt in the fifth judicial department, made October 2, 1894, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion by defendant to amend the judgment in this action so that the costs therein awarded to defendant should be a charge against the county of Allegany.
W. E. Kisselburgh, Jr., for appellant.
Charles U. Brown for respondent.
Reported below, 81 Hun, 137.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur, except Haight, J., not sitting.
Order affirmed.