Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mark Duntz, as Trustee for the Holders of Bonds and Coupons Secured by a Mortgage Executed by the Granger Brewing Company, Appellant, v. Granger Brewing Company et al., Defendants, and Pfaudler Company, Respondent, 1905 — 182 N.Y. 528 · caselaw · US
General
Mark Duntz, as Trustee for the Holders of Bonds and Coupons Secured by a Mortgage Executed by the Granger Brewing Company, Appellant, v. Granger Brewing Company et al., Defendants, and Pfaudler Company, Respondent
182 N.Y. 528·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mark Duntz, as Trustee for the Holders of Bonds and Coupons Secured by a Mortgage Executed by the Granger Brewing Company, Appellant, v. Granger Brewing Company et al., Defendants, and Pfaudler Company, Respondent.
(Submitted June 12, 1905;
decided June 16, 1905.)
Reported below, 96 App. Div. 631.
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered October 1, 1904, affirming a judgment in favor of defendant Pfaudler Company, entered upon a decision of the court on trial as Special Term.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the plaintiff trustee and the bondholders whom he represents have no further interest in the subject-matter of the litigation and. are; therefore, disqualified from prosecuting the appeal, and that the right to appeal has been waived by a sale of the property in dispute pursuant to the judgment of the trial court.
Hiram R. Wood for motion.
Thomas K. Smith opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.