Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Application of The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title to the Lands, Tenements and Hereditaments Required for the Purpose of Opening Whittier Street from Hunt's Road to Whitlock Avenue, in the Twenty-third Ward of the City of New York. Charles D. Dickey, Appellant; The City of New York et al., Respondents, 1900 — 162 N.Y. 658 · caselaw · US
Corporations
In the Matter of the Application of The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title to the Lands, Tenements and Hereditaments Required for the Purpose of Opening Whittier Street from Hunt's Road to Whitlock Avenue, in the Twenty-third Ward of the City of New York. Charles D. Dickey, Appellant; The City of New York et al., Respondents
162 N.Y. 658·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Landon, JJ. Absent: Yann, J.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of The Mayor, Aldermen and Commonalty of the City of New York, Relative to Acquiring Title to the Lands, Tenements and Hereditaments Required for the Purpose of Opening Whittier Street from Hunt’s Road to Whitlock Avenue, in the Twenty-third Ward of the City of New York. Charles D. Dickey, Appellant; The City of New York et al., Respondents.
Matter of the Mayor, 46 App. Div. 53, affirmed.
(Argued April 17, 1900;
decided May 1, 1900.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 8, 1899, reversing an order of Special Term denying a motion to confirm the report of the commissioners of estimate and assessment of the city of New York, and referring the said report back to the commissioners, with a direction to limit the assessments for benefit to one-half of the value of the property assessed as valued by the tax commissioners for the purpose of taxation for the year 1896, and confirming the said report.
Tompkins McIlvaine for appellant.
John Whalen, Corporation Counsel (John, P. Dunn and Thomas C. Blake of counsel), for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, with costs, on opinion below.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Haight, Martin and Landon, JJ. Absent: Yann, J.