General
Catharine A. Pope, Respondent, v. Samuel A. Briggs, as Assignee, et al., Appellants
137 N.Y. 631·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Catharine A. Pope, Respondent, v. Samuel A. Briggs, as Assignee, et al., Appellants.
(Argued March 13, 1893;
decided March 24, 1893,)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made January 13,1893, which affirmed an order of Special Term denying a motion by defendant, Samuel A. Briggs, for a stay of proceedings.
Thomas Darlington for appellants.
Benjamin F. Edsall for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.