Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. CLARK'S GAMBLE CORP., dba CLARK'S DISCOUNT DEPARTMENT STORE, et al., 1969 — 396 U.S. 23 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. CLARK'S GAMBLE CORP., dba CLARK'S DISCOUNT DEPARTMENT STORE, et al.
396 U.S. 23·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD v. CLARK’S GAMBLE CORP., dba CLARK’S DISCOUNT DEPARTMENT STORE, et al.
No. 439.
Decided November 10, 1969
Solicitor General Griswold, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come, and Leonard M. Wagman for petitioner.
Earle K. Shawe for respondent M. N. Landau Stores, Inc.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted, the judgment is vacated, and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit for further consideration in light of NLRB v. Gissel Packing Co., 395 U. S. 575.
Mr. Justice Douglas dissents.