Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Michael Rubino, an Infant, by Anthony Rubino, his Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. William H. Force, et al., Respondents, 1897 — 152 N.Y. 651 · caselaw · US
General
Michael Rubino, an Infant, by Anthony Rubino, his Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. William H. Force, et al., Respondents
152 N.Y. 651·New York Court of Appeals·1897·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Michael Rubino, an Infant, by Anthony Rubino, his Guardian ad Litem, Appellant, v. William H. Force, et al., Respondents.
Rubino v. Force, 13 Misc. Rep. 771, affirmed.
(Submitted March 16, 1897;
decided April 20, 1897.)
Appeal from a judgment of the General Term of the Superior Court of the city of Neiv York, entered July 17, 1895, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed an order denying’ a motion for a new trial.
Robert P. Harlow and M. P. O'Connor for appellant.
Francis Farquhar, for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Martin, J., not voting.