Contracts · MBE-tested
HOLMES v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR
374 U.S. 506·Supreme Court of the United States·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HOLMES v. WAINWRIGHT, CORRECTIONS DIRECTOR.
No. 780, Misc.
Decided June 17, 1963.
Petitioner pro se.
Richard W. Ervin, Attorney General of Florida, and James G. Mahomer, Assistant Attorney General, for respondent.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion for- leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for further consideration in light of Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U. S. 335.