Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
William C. Smith, Appellant, v. James R. Heslin, as Administrator of John L. Millikin, Deceased, et al., Respondents, 1905 — 181 N.Y. 544 · caselaw · US
General
William C. Smith, Appellant, v. James R. Heslin, as Administrator of John L. Millikin, Deceased, et al., Respondents
181 N.Y. 544·New York Court of Appeals·1905·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
William C. Smith, Appellant, v. James R. Heslin, as Administrator of John L. Millikin, Deceased, et al., Respondents.
Smith v. Heslin, 85 App. Div. 628, appeal dismissed.
(Argued April 10, 1905;
decided April 11, 1905.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered July 8, 1903, which affirmed a, judgment of Special Term sustaining a demurrer to the complaint.
The motion was made upon the ground that the appellant liad not perfected the appeal or served upon the respondents his proposed case and exceptions.
M. H. Kiley for motion.
No one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs and ten •dollars costs of motion.