Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
James Stott, Respondent, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant
142 N.Y. 635·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Stott, Respondent, v. The New York, Lake Erie and Western Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Argued March 14, 1894;
decided April 10, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered upon an order made December 12, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and also affirmed, an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Lewis F. Ocurr for appellant.
W. F. O'Neil for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.