Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
HASTORF CONTRACTING CO., Libelant-Appellee, v. OCEAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, Respondent-Appellee, James C. Davis, as Director General of Railroads, etc., Impleaded-Respondent-Appellee, William Spencer & Son Corporation, Respondent-Appellant, 1924 — 4 F.2d 584 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
HASTORF CONTRACTING CO., Libelant-Appellee, v. OCEAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, Respondent-Appellee, James C. Davis, as Director General of Railroads, etc., Impleaded-Respondent-Appellee, William Spencer & Son Corporation, Respondent-Appellant
4 F.2d 584·United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit·1924
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MAN-TON, Circuit Judges.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
HASTORF CONTRACTING CO., Libelant-Appellee, v. OCEAN TRANSPORTATION CORPORATION, Respondent-Appellee, James C. Davis, as Director General of Railroads, etc., Impleaded-Respondent-Appellee, William Spencer & Son Corporation, Respondent-Appellant.
No. 94.
(Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.
November 21, 1924.)
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York.
Affirming decree 4 F.(2d) 583.
Spitz & Bromberger, ■ of New York City (Edgar Bromberger, of New York City, of counsel), for appellant Wm. Spencer & Son.
Foley & Martin, of New York City (William J. Martin and George V. A. MeCloskey, both of New York City, of counsel), for libelant-appellee.
Hunt, Hill & Betts, of New York City (John W. Crandall, of New York City, of counsel), for respondent Ocean Transportation Corporation.
Maeklin, Brown & Yan Wyck, of New York City, for James C. Davis.
Before ROGERS, HOUGH, and MAN-TON, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Decree affirmed.