Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Vanstophorst et al. versus the State of Maryland, 1791 — 2 U.S. 401 · caselaw · US
General
Vanstophorst et al. versus the State of Maryland
2 U.S. 4012 Dall. 401·Supreme Court of the United States·1791
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Vanstophorst et al. versus the State of Maryland.
THE Attorney General (Randolph) moved, on behalf of the plaintiffs, that a commiffion ffiould iflue to examine witneffes in Holland 5 to which the oppofite counfel afiented, although the commiffioners were not named.
[MAJORITY — Et the Court]
But,
Et the Court
:—-We will not award the commiffion, hill commiffioners are named.
This being done, the motion was granted.