General
The Breckenridge Company, Limited, Respondent, v. James D. Perkins et al., Appellants
164 N.Y. 606·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The Breckenridge Company, Limited, Respondent, v. James D. Perkins et al., Appellants.
(Submitted November 12, 1900;
decided November 16, 1900,)
[MAJORITY]
Motion for reargument denied, with ten dollars costs, and the record corrected so as to show that the chief judge did not sit in the case according to the fact, the report in that respect being a clerical error. (See 163 N. Y. 563.)