General

DAHL et al. v. REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE et al.

393 U.S. 408·Supreme Court of the United States·1969

Mr. Justice Harlan, believing that jurisdiction lies in this Court, would affirm the judgmenLbelow.

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

DAHL et al. v. REPUBLICAN STATE COMMITTEE et al. No. 596. Decided January 20, 1969. Alfred J. Schweppe for appellants. Bradley T. Jones for appellees. [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The judgment of the District Court is vacated and the cause is remanded in order that the District Court may enter a fresh decree from which appellants may, if they wish, perfect a timely appeal to the Court of Appeals. Moody v. Flowers, 387 U. S. 97. [DISSENT — Mr. Justice Douglas] Mr. Justice Douglas dissents. Mr. Justice Harlan, believing that jurisdiction lies in this Court, would affirm the judgmenLbelow.