Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John I. Davis, Respondent, v. John B. Borst et al., 1874 — 58 N.Y. 669 · caselaw · US
General
John I. Davis, Respondent, v. John B. Borst et al.
58 N.Y. 669·New York Court of Appeals·1874·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John I. Davis, Respondent, v. John B. Borst et al.
(Argued September 22, 1874;
decided September 29, 1874.)
This is an appeal from an order of (General Term, affirming an order of Special Term denying a motion, on the part of one claiming to have succeeded to the rights of one of the defendants, to have the judgment opened and to be allowed to come in and defend. Meld, the order was not appealable.
J. E. Dewey for the appellant.
E. T. Schenck for the respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal. No opinion. .
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.