General
In the Matter of the Claim of the Chester Rolling Mills, Respondent, v. The Vessels "Hopatcong" and "Musconetcong," their Tackle, etc., Appellants
133 N.Y. 694·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Claim of the Chester Rolling Mills, Respondent, v. The Vessels “Hopatcong” and “Musconetcong,” their Tackle, etc., Appellants.
(Submitted June 7, 1892;
decided June 17, 1892.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court, in the second judicial department, made the second Monday of December, 1891, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting an extra allowance.
Henry Schmitt for appellants.
Harvey Weed for respondent,
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.