Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Meyer Jonasson, Appellant, v. Edward E. Eames et al., Respondents, 1894 — 142 N.Y. 653 · caselaw · US
General
Meyer Jonasson, Appellant, v. Edward E. Eames et al., Respondents
142 N.Y. 653·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Meyer Jonasson, Appellant, v. Edward E. Eames et al., Respondents.
(Argued April 12, 1894;
decided May 1, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon an order made at the January term, 1893, which affirmed a judgment in favor of defendants entered upon an order dismissing the complaint on trial at Circuit.
Alexa/nder Flumenstiel for appellant.
8. F. Eneeland and Gha/rles F. Fushmore for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.