Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Continental National Bank of Boston, Respondent, v. United States Book Company et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants, 1894 — 143 N.Y. 648 · caselaw · US
General
Continental National Bank of Boston, Respondent, v. United States Book Company et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants
143 N.Y. 648·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Continental National Bank of Boston, Respondent, v. United States Book Company et al., Impleaded, etc., Appellants.
(Argued June 19, 1894;
decided June 22,1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made December 22, 1893, which affirmed an order of Special Term which denied a motion to set aside a judgment in favor of plaintiff against the defendant Horace T. Thurber.
H. Ajplmgton for appellants.
Willia/m, B. BCornblower for respondent.
Reported below, 74 Hun, 633.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Order affirmed.