Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
BRUGERE v. SLIDELL; HEATH v. SLIDELL, 1874 — 154 U.S. 598 · caselaw · US
General
BRUGERE v. SLIDELL; HEATH v. SLIDELL
154 U.S. 598·Supreme Court of the United States·1874
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BRUGERE v. SLIDELL. HEATH v. SLIDELL.
ERROR TO THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF LOUISIANA.-
Nos. 479, 532.
Submitted January 8, 1874.
Decided January 19, 1874.
Bigelow v. Forrest, 9 Wall. 339, and Bay v. Micou, 18 Wall. 156, followed.
Mr. L. M. Day for plaintiffs in error.
Mr. Thomas Allen Clarice for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Mr. Justice Strong]
Mr. Justice Strong
delivered the opinion of the court.
Both these eases are controlled by the decisions made in Bigelow v. Forrest, 9 Wall. 339, and in Day v. Micou, just decided, 18 Wall. 156.
Judgment in both eases Affirmed.