Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Thomas Thorn et al., Respondents, v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company et al., Appellants; Same v. Same; Same v. Same, 1892 — 132 N.Y. 555 · caselaw · US
General
Thomas Thorn et al., Respondents, v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company et al., Appellants; Same v. Same; Same v. Same
132 N.Y. 555·New York Court of Appeals·1892·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Thomas Thorn et al., Respondents, v. The Metropolitan Elevated Railway Company et al., Appellants. Same v. Same. Same v. Same.
(Submitted February 12,1892;
decided March 8, 1892.)
Appeal from judgments of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered upon orders made March 28, 1890, each of which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered upon a decision of the court on trial at Special Term.
Bramaré Tolies for appellants.
William Mitchell for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm judgments upon opinion in Mitchell v. Met, E. R. Co. (ante, page 552).
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.