Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
BRAFFITH v. PEOPLE OF VIRGIN ISLANDS, 1928 — 29 F.2d 740 · caselaw · US
Criminal Law · MBE-tested
BRAFFITH v. PEOPLE OF VIRGIN ISLANDS
29 F.2d 740·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1928
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
BRAFFITH v. PEOPLE OF VIRGIN ISLANDS.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
December 10, 1928.
No. 3881.
D. H. Jackson, of Christiansted, St. Croix, Virgin Islands, for appellant.
James C. Fox, of Christiansted, St. Croix, Virgin Islands, for the People.
Before BUFFINGTON, WOOLLEY, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
This appeal under the laws of the Virgin Islands is compulsory. Braffith v. People of Virgin Islands (C. C. A.) 26 F.(2d) 646. In view of the prisoner’s plea 'of guilty entered to a charge of murder in the first degree, our inquiry on this appeal has been directed, and limited, to a search for fundamental irregularities in the proceeding and to a possible abuse by the court of its discretion in determining the punishment. Braffith v. People of Virgin Islands, supra. On our review of the record, made with a care which the gravity of the case required, we found no errors of either kind.
The judgment must therefore be affirmed.