Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Joseph W. Kay, Respondent, v. Robert Grier Monroe, as Commissioner of Water Supply, Gas and Electricity of the City of New York, et al., Appellants, 1906 — 185 N.Y. 591 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Joseph W. Kay, Respondent, v. Robert Grier Monroe, as Commissioner of Water Supply, Gas and Electricity of the City of New York, et al., Appellants
185 N.Y. 591·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Joseph W. Kay, Respondent, v. Robert Grier Monroe, as Commissioner of Water Supply, Gas and Electricity of the City of New York, et al., Appellants.
Kay v. Monroe, 109 App. Div. 913, affirmed.
(Argued May 24, 1906;
decided June 12, 1906.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 12, 1905, affirming a judgment of Special Term enjoining the defendant commissioner from carrying out a contract for the purchase of water meters.
John J. Delany, Corporation Counsel (James D. Bell of counsel), Alfred J. Talley and Frederick St. John for appellants.
Walter Thorn for. respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch, J., Gray, Edward T. Bartlett, Haight, Werner and Hiscock, JJ. Absent: O’Brien; J.