General
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. et al.
389 U.S. 933·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 620.
Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co. et al.
David Leo Uelman and Milton Kramer for petitioner.
Francis M. Shea, Richard T. Conway, Benjamin W. Boley, James R. Wolfe, Charles I. Hopkins, Jr., and James P. Reedy for respondent Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Co., and Acting Solicitor General Spritzer for respondent Seward.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. D. C. Cir. Certiorari denied.