General
LOCUST CLUB OF ROCHESTER et al. v. CITY OF ROCHESTER et al.
393 U.S. 481·Supreme Court of the United States·1969
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
LOCUST CLUB OF ROCHESTER et al. v. CITY OF ROCHESTER et al.
No. 799.
Decided January 27, 1969.
Ronald J. Buttarazzi for appellants.
Sterling L. Weaver and Ruth B. Rosenberg for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Mr. Justice Black and Mr. Justice White are of the opinion that probable jurisdiction should be noted.