Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Barba v. California; Dilboy v. New Hampshire, 2011 — 564 U.S. 1051 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Barba v. California; Dilboy v. New Hampshire
564 U.S. 1051·Supreme Court of the United States·2011
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 10-5479.
No. 10-6278.
Barba v. California. Dilboy v. New Hampshire.
[MAJORITY]
Ct. App. Cal., 2d App. Dist.; and Sup. Ct. N. H. Motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis granted. Certiorari granted, judgments vacated, and eases remanded for further consideration in light of Bullcoming v. New Mexico, ante, p. 647.