Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Calvin E. Hull, Appellant, v. Adelbert Cronk et al., Respondents, 1901 — 166 N.Y. 606 · caselaw · US
General
Calvin E. Hull, Appellant, v. Adelbert Cronk et al., Respondents
166 N.Y. 606·New York Court of Appeals·1901·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Calvin E. Hull, Appellant, v. Adelbert Cronk et al., Respondents.
Hull v. Cronk, 55 App. Div. 83, appeal dismissed.
(Submitted March 11, 1901;
decided March 19, 1901.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered December 11, 1900, affirming a judgment in ■favor of defendants entered upon a dismissal of the complaint by the court at a Trial Term.
The motion was made upon the grounds that the Appellate Division has unanimously decided that there was evidence supporting the findings of the trial court and has not allowed the appeal nor certified that a question of law has arisen which ought to be reviewed, by the Court of Appeals, and that there is no question involved which this court has jurisdiction to review.
Irving W. Cole for motion.
No one opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion granted and appeal dismissed, with costs.