Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc., et al.; and United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission et al. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc., et al., 1978 — 434 U.S. 1044 · caselaw · US
General
Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc., et al.; and United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission et al. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc., et al.
434 U.S. 1044·Supreme Court of the United States·1978
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 77-262.
No. 77-375.
Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc., et al.; and United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission et al. v. Carolina Environmental Study Group, Inc., et al.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from D. C. W. D. N. C. [Probable jurisdiction noted, ante, p. 937.] Motions of Southeastern Legal Foundation and Pacific Legal Foundation for leave to file briefs as amici curiae granted. Motion of the Solicitor General for additional, time for oral argument granted and 15 additional minutes allotted for that, purpose. Appellees also allotted 15 additional minutes for oral argument.