Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel K. Ellenbogen, Appellant, 1906 — 186 N.Y. 603 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel K. Ellenbogen, Appellant
186 N.Y. 603·New York Court of Appeals·1906·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Samuel K. Ellenbogen, Appellant.
People v. Ellenbogen, 114 App. Div. 182, affirmed.
(Argued November 27, 1906;
decided December 11, 1906.)
Appeal from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered July 25,1906, which, affirmed a judgment rendered at a Trial Term ' upon a verdict convicting the defendant of feloniously making a false statement under oath in violation of section 7 of the Metropolitan Elections District Law.
George M. Curtis for appellant.
Julius M. Mayer, Attorney-Generad [Lewis Ogden O'Brien of counsel), for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment of conviction affirmed; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Haight, Yann and Chase, JJ. Dissenting: Edward T. Bartlett and Willard Bartlett, JJ. Absent: O’Brien, J.