General
O'Hare, Appellant, vs. Fink, Respondent
254 Wis. 69·Wisconsin Supreme Court·1948·WI
Brief incoming
Source-anchored Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
O’Hare, Appellant, vs. Fink, Respondent.
November 16
December 15, 1948.
For the appellant there was a brief by Doar & Knowles of New Richmond, and oral argument by W. T. Doar.
For the respondent there was a brief by Coe & Cameron of Rice Lake, and oral argument by William A. Cameron.
Motion for rehearing denied, with $25 costs, on February 15, 1949.
[MAJORITY — Hughes, J.]
Hughes, J.
The only questions sought to be raised concern the correctness of the trial court’s rulings during the trial. The bill of exceptions having been stricken (O’Hare v. Fink, ante, p. 65, 35 N. W. (2d) 320) and the pleadings and findings being sufficient to sustain the judgment, the judgment must be affirmed.
By the Court. — Judgment affirmed.