Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George Barker, Respondent, v. The Cunard Steamship Company (Limited), Appellant, 1898 — 157 N.Y. 693 · caselaw · US
General
George Barker, Respondent, v. The Cunard Steamship Company (Limited), Appellant
157 N.Y. 693·New York Court of Appeals·1898·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George Barker, Respondent, v. The Cunard Steamship Company (Limited), Appellant.
Ba/rker v. Ounard Steamship Go., 91 Hun, 495, affirmed.
(Argued October 17, 1898 ;
decided November 22, 1898.)
Appeal from a judgment and order of the late General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered respectively December 31 and 26, 1895, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict, and an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Joseph Kling and William M. Ivins for appellant.
Franklin Pierce and Abraham Gruber for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
All concur, except Parker, Ch. J.,' not sitting.