Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Remington Rand, Inc. v. Societe Internationale pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A., et al., 1951 — 342 U.S. 832 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Remington Rand, Inc. v. Societe Internationale pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A., et al.
342 U.S. 832·Supreme Court of the United States·1951
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 148.
Remington Rand, Inc. v. Societe Internationale pour Participations Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A., et al.
William P. MacCracken, Jr., Urban A. Lavery and William W. Barron for petitioner.
Solicitor General Perlman, Assistant Attorney General Baynton, George B. Searls and David Schwartz for Mc-Grath et al.; and John J. Wilson and Donald Hiss for the Societe Internationale pour Participations' Industrielles et Commerciales, S. A., • respondents.
[MAJORITY]
United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Clark took no part in the consideration or decision of this application.