Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Villeneuve versus Barrion, 1795 — 2 U.S. 235 · caselaw · US
General
Villeneuve versus Barrion
2 U.S. 2352 Dall. 235·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1795·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Villeneuve versus Barrion.
IT was agreed by the parties to submit this question to the Court, to wit:—Whether the Convention gave to the French Consul cognizance of all differences and suits between Frenchmen; or confined the same to the description of cases therein enumerated, or other cases not arising from transactions in the United States ? And, further, that if the Court should be of opinion, that the Consular Jurisdiction extends generally to all differences and suits between Frenchmen, that then the plaintiff shall discontinue the present action without costs.
[MAJORITY]
The Court, after hearing the counsel of both sides, on the question proposed, were of opinion, that the Consular Jurisdiction does not extend generally to all differences and suits between Frenchmen.
The plaintiff, thereupon, prayed leave to discontinue his said action without costs; which being granted, he did discontinue accordingly.