Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Ivanhoe Irrigation District et al. v. McCracken et al.; Madera Irrigation District et al. v. Steiner et al.; Madera Irrigation District v. Albonico et ux.; and Santa Barbara County Water Agency v. Balaam et al., 1957 — 355 U.S. 803 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Ivanhoe Irrigation District et al. v. McCracken et al.; Madera Irrigation District et al. v. Steiner et al.; Madera Irrigation District v. Albonico et ux.; and Santa Barbara County Water Agency v. Balaam et al.
355 U.S. 803·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 122.
No. 123.
No. 124.
No. 125.
Ivanhoe Irrigation District et al. v. McCracken et al. ; Madera Irrigation District et al. v. Steiner et al. ; Madera Irrigation District v. Albonico et ux.; and Santa Barbara County Water Agency v. Balaam et al.
Edmund G. Brown, Attorney General, and B. Abbott Goldberg and Adolphus Moskovitz, Deputy Attorneys General, for the State of California et al., Denver C. Peckinpah for the Madera Irrigation District, and Francis Price, Sr. for the Santa Barbara County Water Agency, appellants. Harry W. Horton, Reginald L. Knox, Jr., W. R. Bailey, Denslow B. Green, Sherman Anderson, Herman Phleger and Alvin J. Rockwell for appellees. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Morton, David R. Warner and Roger P. Marquis filed a memorandum for the United States, as amicus curiae, in support of jurisdiction. Edson Abel filed a memorandum for the California Farm Bureau Federation, as amicus curiae, supporting the motion to dismiss the appeal in No. 122.
[MAJORITY]
Appeals from the Supreme Court of California. Further consideration of the question of jurisdiction is postponed to the hearing of the cases on the merits.