General

In the Matter of the Application of The Manhattan Railway Company et al., Appellants, v. Eugene O'Sullivan et al., Respondents

150 N.Y. 569·New York Court of Appeals·1896·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of the Application of The Manhattan Railway Company et al., Appellants, v. Eugene O’Sullivan et al., Respondents. (Argued October 5, 1896; decided October 20, 1896.) Manludtan E. Co. v. O’Sullivan, 6 App. Div. 071, affirmed. Appeal from order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made June 23, 1896, which reversed an order of Special Term setting aside the report of commissioners of appraisal in condemnation proceedings and confirmed the report.] Edward 0. James for appellants. Treadwell Cleveland, for respondents. [MAJORITY] Order affirmed, on opinion below, with costs. All concur, except O’Bbien, J., taking no part.