Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
George C. HOPKINS, Collector of Internal Revenue, Appellant, v. W. D. CLINE and Ella Pipes Cline, Appellees, 1931 — 53 F.2d 1081 · caselaw · US
Tax
George C. HOPKINS, Collector of Internal Revenue, Appellant, v. W. D. CLINE and Ella Pipes Cline, Appellees
53 F.2d 1081·United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
George C. HOPKINS, Collector of Internal Revenue, Appellant, v. W. D. CLINE and Ella Pipes Cline, Appellees.
No. 6294.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
Nov. 30, 1931.
Norman A. Dodge, U. S. Atty., of Fort Worth, Tex., and Wright Matthews, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Harry C. Weeks, of Wichita Falls, Tex., for appellees.
Before BRYAN, FOSTER, and SIBLEY, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
In the above numbered and entitled cause comes the appellant, by his counsel, Norman A. Dodge, Esq., United States attorney, and Wright Matthews, Esq., special attorney, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and the appellees, by their counsel, Harry C. Weeks. Esq., and file a joint stipulation for settlement of said cause.
Pursuant to said stipulation, it is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the District Court for the Northern District of Texas, in so far as it relates to the recovery óf the payment of $22,-196.30, with interest, made by Ella Pipes Cline, be affirmed, and that said judgment, in so far as it relates to the recovery of the payment of $15,303.79', with interest, made by W. D. Cline, be reversed, and that said cause be, and it is, hereby remanded to the said District Court for further proceedings.
It is further ordered that the mandate of this court shall issue without delay.