Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
James Ten Eyck et al., Appellants, v. The Rector and Inhabitants of the City of Albany in Communion with the Protestant Episcopal Church, etc., in the State of New York, Respondent, 1894 — 141 N.Y. 588 · caselaw · US
General
James Ten Eyck et al., Appellants, v. The Rector and Inhabitants of the City of Albany in Communion with the Protestant Episcopal Church, etc., in the State of New York, Respondent
141 N.Y. 588·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
James Ten Eyck et al., Appellants, v. The Rector and Inhabitants of the City of Albany in Communion with the Protestant Episcopal Church, etc., in the State of New York, Respondent.
(Argued January 31, 1894;
decided February 27, 1894.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the third judicial department, entered upon an order made the second Tuesday of May, 1892, which directed judgment in favor of defendant upon a case submitted under the Code of Civil Procedure (§ 1279).
Artlmv L. Andrews for ajrpellants.
Abraham Lmising for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on prevailing opinions below.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.
65 Hun, 194.