Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bartels et al., doing business as Crystal Ballroom, v. Birmingham, Collector of Internal Revenue, et al.; and Geer et al., doing business as Larry Geer Ballrooms, v. Birmingham, Collector of Internal Revenue, 1947 — 329 U.S. 711 · caselaw · US
Tax
Bartels et al., doing business as Crystal Ballroom, v. Birmingham, Collector of Internal Revenue, et al.; and Geer et al., doing business as Larry Geer Ballrooms, v. Birmingham, Collector of Internal Revenue
329 U.S. 711·Supreme Court of the United States·1947
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 731.
No. 732.
Bartels et al., doing business as Crystal Ballroom, v. Birmingham, Collector of Internal Revenue, et al.; and Geer et al., doing business as Larry Geer Ballrooms, v. Birmingham, Collector of Internal Revenue.
January 6, 1947.
Clyde B. Charlton and Joseph I, Brody for petitioners. Joseph A. Padway and Chauncey A. Weaver for Williams et al., respondents in No. 731.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writs of certio-rari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit granted.
Reported below: 157 F. 2d 295.