Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
David BURNET, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Appellant, v. Louis A. WHITCOMB, Appellee, 1933 — 65 F.2d 809 · caselaw · US
Tax
David BURNET, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Appellant, v. Louis A. WHITCOMB, Appellee
65 F.2d 809·United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David BURNET, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Appellant, v. Louis A. WHITCOMB, Appellee.
No. 5665.
Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia.
Argued March 13, 1933.
Decided May 22, 1933.
G. A. Youngquist, Sewall Key, C. M. Charest, and John D. Foley, all of Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Claude R. Branch, of Boston, Mass., and W. W. Spalding, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB, VAN ORSDEL, HITZ, and GRONER, Associate Justices.
[MAJORITY — MARTIN, Chief Justice.]
MARTIN, Chief Justice.
The issues in this appeal are controlled by the same principles as those in Burnet v. Whitcomb, 62 App. D. C. 170, 65 F.(2d) 803, which is concurrently decided by us.
The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is accordingly reversed and the cause is remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.
GRONER, Associate Justice, dissents.