Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
WHELAN v. THE UNITED STATES, 1812 — 11 U.S. 112 · caselaw · US
Civil Procedure · MBE-tested
WHELAN v. THE UNITED STATES
11 U.S. 1127 Cranch 112·Supreme Court of the United States·1812
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
WHELAN v. THE UNITED STATES.
Case, of aeiters^avPaWe" from thlsea, by vessels of ientons tar-then for breach civil cases ¿f admiralty; and riStíon/and are to be tried “t^^-Jy
THIS cause standing so late on the docket that it was hot-likely to be called for trial at this term, Dauras, for the United States, suggested the propriety of assigning a" particular day for the hearing, as it was a case of importance, and involved a question of jurisdiction, viz : whether a seizure of a vessel^ on waters navigable from sea^or vessels of ten and moré tons burthen,, for breach of a law of the United States, uvas to be tried by a jury. This question was said to be important because the judge of the district of Pennsylvania had refused to try any cases of that kind, until the. question was finaisettled by.this Court.
The Court accordingly assigned a day for bearing that question, but intimated an opinion that it was already decided in the cases of the Vengeance 3. Dall. 297.-The Betsy and Charlotte. 4. Cranch, 443. and Yeaton v. United States, 5. Cranch, 281.
E. Tiughman, for the.Appellant, after looking into those cases, -abandoned the question as to jurisdiction, considering the cases cited as conclusive, against him.
[MAJORITY]
The Court, (all the judges being present,) said that the question had been certainly settled in this Court, - upon full argument.