Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Georgia v. Tuttle, Chief Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals, et al., 1964 — 377 U.S. 987 · caselaw · US
General
Georgia v. Tuttle, Chief Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals, et al.
377 U.S. 987·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1361,
Misc.
Georgia v. Tuttle, Chief Judge, U. S. Court of Appeals, et al.
Eugene Cook, Attorney General of Georgia, Albert Sidney Johnson, Assistant Attorney General, and J. Robert Sparks for petitioner.
Donald L. Hollowell and Jack Greenberg for Rachel et al., respondents.
William M.
Kunstler, Arthur Kinoy, Nils R. Douglas, Robert F. Collins, Carl Rachlin, Floyd B. McKissick and Michael J. Kunstler for Congress of Racial Equality, Inc., et al., as amici curiae, in opposition.
[MAJORITY]
Motion of Congress of Racial Equality, Inc., et al. for leave to file a brief, as amici curiae, granted. Motion for leave to file petition for writ of prohibition and/or mandamus denied.