Skip to main content

Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.

Ellis v. Dixon et al., Members of the Board of Education of the City of Yonkers; Papalardo et al. v. United States, In re Rines, Administrator, Schwartz, Administratrix, v. Kansas City Southern Railway Co.; Beecher v. Leavenworth State Bank et al.; Beecher v. Leavenworth State Bank et al.; Alker v. Fidelity-Philadelphia Trust Co., Trustee, et al.; Beaty v. United States; Thys Company et al. v. Anglo-California National Bank, Executor; Coco v. Florida; Hupman v. United States; Kostal v. California; Heirens v. Illinois; Rodriguez v. Jackson, Warden; Wilson v. District of Columbia; Hill v. United States, 1955 — 350 U.S. 855 · caselaw · US