General
Peter S. March et al., Respondents, v. The First National Bank of Mobile, Appellant
64 N.Y. 645·New York Court of Appeals·1876·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Peter S. March et al., Respondents, v. The First National Bank of Mobile, Appellant.
(Argued February 14, 1876;
decided March 21, 1876.)
Wm. H. Scott for the appellant.
S. P. Nash for the respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm. No prevailing opinion.
All concur, except Church, Ch. J., and Miller, J., not voting, and Alleft, J., dissenting. Alleft, J., wrote dissenting opinion.
Judgment affirmed.