Skip to main content
Constitutional Court· 1998landmark

National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Justice

1999 (1) SA 6 (CC)· [1998] ZACC 15
Constitutional

Sodomy laws struck down for violating equality and dignity of gay men.

At a glance

The Constitutional Court declared the common law crime of sodomy and related statutory offences unconstitutional insofar as they criminalized consensual sexual conduct between men. The Court held that these laws violated the equality and dignity guarantees in the Constitution, marking a watershed moment for LGBTQ+ rights in South Africa.

Material facts

The National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality challenged the constitutionality of the common law offence of sodomy and certain sections of the Sexual Offences Act that criminalized consensual same-sex sexual conduct between men. The applicants argued these laws unfairly discriminated on the basis of sexual orientation and violated human dignity.

Issues

Whether the common law offence of sodomy and related statutory provisions that criminalize consensual sexual conduct between men are inconsistent with the Constitution, particularly the equality clause and the right to dignity.

Held

The Court declared the common law offence of sodomy and related statutory offences unconstitutional and invalid to the extent that they criminalized consensual sexual conduct between men. The provisions were found to violate the rights to equality, dignity, and privacy enshrined in the Constitution.

Ratio decidendi

Laws that criminalize private consensual sexual conduct between adults solely on the basis of sexual orientation constitute unfair discrimination and impair the human dignity of gay and lesbian persons, violating the constitutional guarantees of equality and dignity.

Reasoning

The Court found that the impugned provisions unfairly discriminated against gay men by criminalizing their intimate consensual conduct while not criminalizing equivalent conduct by heterosexuals or lesbians. This discrimination was based on an immutable characteristic (sexual orientation) and reinforced harmful stereotypes, causing profound harm to the dignity, personhood, and identity of gay men. The laws could not be justified in an open and democratic society based on human dignity, equality, and freedom.

Obiter dicta

The Court emphasized the transformative nature of the South African Constitution and its commitment to substantive equality, signaling that constitutional protections extend robustly to sexual minorities and that the law must reflect the diverse nature of South African society.

Significance

This case is foundational in South African constitutional law and LGBTQ+ jurisprudence, representing one of the first major Constitutional Court decisions to vindicate sexual orientation as a protected ground under the equality clause. It laid the groundwork for subsequent progressive judgments on LGBTQ+ rights, including same-sex marriage, and demonstrated the Constitution's transformative potential in dismantling discriminatory apartheid-era laws.

How to cite (SA law-reports)

National Coalition for Gay and Lesbian Equality v Minister of Justice 1999 (1) SA 6 (CC) [1998] ZACC 15

Source: judgment available on SAFLII. caselaw publishes editorial briefs only and honours SAFLII's ai-train=no directive — no AI training on SAFLII content.

Related cases

POPIA: case data published under SAFLII attribution. Information Officer queries → [email protected].