Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2005

Coda v. Canada (Ministry of Social Development Canada)

2005 FCA 206
AdministrativeJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Coda v. Canada (Ministry of Social Development Canada) Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2005-05-31 Neutral citation 2005 FCA 206 File numbers A-352-04 Decision Content Date: 20050531 Docket: A-352-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 206 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. NOËL J.A. EVANS J.A. BETWEEN: JOSEPH CODA Appellant and MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CANADA Respondent Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, May 31, 2005. Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on May 31, 2005. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: EVANS J.A. Date: 20050531 Docket: A-352-04 Citation: 2005 FCA 206 CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A. NOËL J.A. EVANS J.A. BETWEEN: JOSEPH CODA Appellant and MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CANADA Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on May 31, 2005) EVANS J.A. [1] In this application for judicial review, Joseph Coda requests the Court to set aside a decision of the Pensions Appeals Board, dated October 4, 2002, in which it dismissed an appeal from a decision of the Review Tribunal. The Board held that he was not entitled to long term disability benefits, on the ground that, on or before December 1997, when he last met the minimum qualifying period, his disability was not "severe" within the meaning of section 42 of the Canada Pension Plan, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-8. [2] We are all of the view that the application must be dismissed. The Board applied the correct legal test for determining whether Mr. Coda's disability was "severe…

Read full judgment
Coda v. Canada (Ministry of Social Development Canada)
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2005-05-31
Neutral citation
2005 FCA 206
File numbers
A-352-04
Decision Content
Date: 20050531
Docket: A-352-04
Citation: 2005 FCA 206
CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
NOËL J.A.
EVANS J.A.
BETWEEN:
JOSEPH CODA
Appellant
and
MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CANADA
Respondent
Heard at Ottawa, Ontario, May 31, 2005.
Judgment delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on May 31, 2005.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: EVANS J.A.
Date: 20050531
Docket: A-352-04
Citation: 2005 FCA 206
CORAM: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
NOËL J.A.
EVANS J.A.
BETWEEN:
JOSEPH CODA
Appellant
and
MINISTRY OF SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT CANADA
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the Bench at Ottawa, Ontario, on May 31, 2005)
EVANS J.A.
[1] In this application for judicial review, Joseph Coda requests the Court to set aside a decision of the Pensions Appeals Board, dated October 4, 2002, in which it dismissed an appeal from a decision of the Review Tribunal. The Board held that he was not entitled to long term disability benefits, on the ground that, on or before December 1997, when he last met the minimum qualifying period, his disability was not "severe" within the meaning of section 42 of the Canada Pension Plan, R.S.C. 1985, c. C-8.
[2] We are all of the view that the application must be dismissed. The Board applied the correct legal test for determining whether Mr. Coda's disability was "severe" and we are not persuaded that its application of the law to the facts was patently unreasonable. Nor can it be said that the Board committed a reviewable error by ignoring significant evidence that Mr. Coda's disability was "severe".
[3] For these reasons the application for judicial review will be dismissed.
"John M. Evans"
J.A.
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-352-04
STYLE OF CAUSE: Joseph Coda v. Ministry of Social Development Canada
PLACE OF HEARING: Ottawa, Ontario
DATE OF HEARING: May 31, 2005
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: ROTHSTEIN J.A.
NOËL J.A.
EVANS J.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: EVANS J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Mr. David. W. Shannon
FOR THE APPLICANT
Mr. Marcus Davies
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
David W. Shannon Law Office
Thunder Bay, Ontario
FOR THE APPLICANT
John H. Sims, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases