Man v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Court headnote
Man v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2004-02-20 Neutral citation 2004 FC 258 File numbers IMM-895-04 Decision Content Date: 20040220 Docket: IMM-895-04 Citation: 2004 FC 258 BETWEEN: HUNG PONG MAN Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION and THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA Respondents REASONS FOR ORDER LEMIEUX J. [1] I reduce to writing the oral decision rendered when granting Mr. Man a stay from his removal to China pending determination of his leave and judicial review application from a negative risk assessment rendered by a PRRA officer in January of this year. [2] In parallel proceedings in IMM-896-04 I granted Mr. Man a stay in respect of a negative H & C decision he also received in January of this year. The background facts are set out in my Reasons for Order in that case and need not be repeated here. [3] The focus of the risk assessment turns on the treatment accorded in China to returnees to that country after conviction abroad for drug related offences which is what Mr. Man was convicted of twice (in 1993 and 1998) after being landed in this country in 1991 under a special programme set up after the Tian An Men Square massacre. [4] I determined the applicant had made out serious issues related to three matters: 1) the appearance of institutional bias because of the interaction between an enforcement officer and the PRRA officer; 2) the failure of the PRRA officer to state how and w…
Read full judgment
Man v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2004-02-20 Neutral citation 2004 FC 258 File numbers IMM-895-04 Decision Content Date: 20040220 Docket: IMM-895-04 Citation: 2004 FC 258 BETWEEN: HUNG PONG MAN Applicant and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION and THE SOLICITOR GENERAL OF CANADA Respondents REASONS FOR ORDER LEMIEUX J. [1] I reduce to writing the oral decision rendered when granting Mr. Man a stay from his removal to China pending determination of his leave and judicial review application from a negative risk assessment rendered by a PRRA officer in January of this year. [2] In parallel proceedings in IMM-896-04 I granted Mr. Man a stay in respect of a negative H & C decision he also received in January of this year. The background facts are set out in my Reasons for Order in that case and need not be repeated here. [3] The focus of the risk assessment turns on the treatment accorded in China to returnees to that country after conviction abroad for drug related offences which is what Mr. Man was convicted of twice (in 1993 and 1998) after being landed in this country in 1991 under a special programme set up after the Tian An Men Square massacre. [4] I determined the applicant had made out serious issues related to three matters: 1) the appearance of institutional bias because of the interaction between an enforcement officer and the PRRA officer; 2) the failure of the PRRA officer to state how and why he sorted out conflicting documentary evidence on China's treatment of convicted drug returnees and 3) the circumstances the PRRA officer obtained information from Canadian officials in Beijing on China's drug policy in respect of returnees. [5] Irreparable harm was made out - China's returnee policy for convicted drug offenders entailed possible imprisonment and execution. [6] The balance of convenience favoured the applicant, having met the first two tests. (Sgd.) "F. Lemieux" Judge Vancouver, British Columbia February 20, 2004 FEDERAL COURT NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-895-04 STYLE OF CAUSE: Hung Pong Man v The Minister of Citizenship and Immigration PLACE OF HEARING: Vancouver British Columbia DATE OF HEARING: February 16th, 2004 REASONS FOR ORDER: LEMIEUX J. DATED: February 20th, 2004 APPEARANCES: Darryl W. Larson FOR APPLICANT Esta Resnick FOR RESPONDENTS SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Embarkation Law Group FOR APPLICANT Vancouver BC Morris Rosenberg FOR RESPONDENTS Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca