Skip to main content
Federal Court of Appeal· 2004

Trudel-Leblanc v. Canada

2004 FCA 115
Quebec civil lawJD
Cite or share
Share via WhatsAppEmail
Showing the official court-reporter headnote. An editorial brief (facts · issues · held · ratio · significance) is on the roadmap for this case. The judgment text below is the authoritative source.

Court headnote

Trudel-Leblanc v. Canada Court (s) Database Federal Court of Appeal Decisions Date 2004-03-17 Neutral citation 2004 FCA 115 File numbers A-160-03 Decision Content Date: 20040317 Docket: A-160-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 115 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: VIVIANE TRUDEL-LEBLANC Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on March 17, 2004. Judgment delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on March 17, 2004. REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: NOËL J.A. Date: 20040317 Docket: A-160-03 Citation: 2004 FCA 115 CORAM: RICHARD C.J. NOËL J.A. PELLETIER J.A. BETWEEN: VIVIANE TRUDEL-LEBLANC Appellant and HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on March 17, 2004) NOËL J.A. [1] In our opinion, Tardif J.T.C.C. was entitled to affirm the assessments at issue, based on the evidence before him, even if the facts that he considered went beyond those on which the Minister relied to issue the assessments. [2] Contrary to Pedwell v. Canada, [2000] 4 F.C. 616, the judge of the Tax Court of Canada did not refer to a transaction other than the one cited by the Minister in issuing his assessments. He stated, in the course of his decision, that the ground retained by the Minister was not conclusive, in itself, but that he found that it became conclusive when considered with the other evidence filed, in large part, by the appellant herself. [3] This is not a situation whe…

Read full judgment
Trudel-Leblanc v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2004-03-17
Neutral citation
2004 FCA 115
File numbers
A-160-03
Decision Content
Date: 20040317
Docket: A-160-03
Citation: 2004 FCA 115
CORAM: RICHARD C.J.
NOËL J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
BETWEEN:
VIVIANE TRUDEL-LEBLANC
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on March 17, 2004.
Judgment delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on March 17, 2004.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: NOËL J.A.
Date: 20040317
Docket: A-160-03
Citation: 2004 FCA 115
CORAM: RICHARD C.J.
NOËL J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
BETWEEN:
VIVIANE TRUDEL-LEBLANC
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on March 17, 2004)
NOËL J.A.
[1] In our opinion, Tardif J.T.C.C. was entitled to affirm the assessments at issue, based on the evidence before him, even if the facts that he considered went beyond those on which the Minister relied to issue the assessments.
[2] Contrary to Pedwell v. Canada, [2000] 4 F.C. 616, the judge of the Tax Court of Canada did not refer to a transaction other than the one cited by the Minister in issuing his assessments. He stated, in the course of his decision, that the ground retained by the Minister was not conclusive, in itself, but that he found that it became conclusive when considered with the other evidence filed, in large part, by the appellant herself.
[3] This is not a situation where the appellant can legitimately claim that she did not have an opportunity to argue her point of view about the debate, as it was presented before the trial judge.
[4] Moreover, the evidence enabled Tardif J.T.C.C. to make a finding of fact that the income at issue was the appellant's, and not that of her company.
[5] The appeal will be dismissed with costs.
"Marc Noël"
J.A.
Certified true translation
Kelley A. Harvey, BA, BCL, LLB
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-160-03
STYLE OF CAUSE: VIVIANE TRUDEL-LEBLANC
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF HEARING: March 17, 2004
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT: RICHARD C.J.
NOËL J.A.
PELLETIER J.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: NOËL J.A.
APPEARANCES:
André A. Lévesque
FOR THE APPELLANT
Valérie Tardif
Nathalie Labbé
FOR THE RESPONDENT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
André A. Lévesque
Bonaventure, Quebec
FOR THE APPELLANT
MORRIS ROSENBERG
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Montréal, Quebec
FOR THE RESPONDENT

Source: decisions.fca-caf.gc.ca

Related cases