Omoruyi v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration)
Court headnote
Omoruyi v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2003-10-21 Neutral citation 2003 FC 1222 File numbers IMM-5243-01 Decision Content Date: 20031021 Docket: IMM-5243-01 Citation: 2003 FC 1222 Ottawa, Ontario, this 21st day of October, 2003 Present: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE O'REILLY BETWEEN: CHIKAODILI SARITA OMORUYI AND CHRISTOPHER OSARETIN OMORUYI Applicants and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT [1] Chikaodili Omoruyi applied to become a permanent resident of Canada on the strength of her qualifications as a hospital pharmacist. Her application was evaluated by a visa officer at the Canadian High Commission in London, England. The officer awarded her a total of 68 points, just short of the 70 points required for a successful application. The officer awarded her no points for job experience or occupational factors. Ms. Omoruyi argues that the officer's assessment was seriously flawed and asks, by way of this application for judicial review, for a reconsideration of her application by a different officer. [2] I agree with Ms. Omoruyi that the visa officer erred and that she deserves to have her application reconsidered. [3] Ms. Omoruyi stated in her application that she had worked as a hospital pharmacist from August 1998 to September 1999. Similarly, her resume set out her employment history and described her experience working at the Military Hospital Ikoyi in Ni…
Read full judgment
Omoruyi v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2003-10-21 Neutral citation 2003 FC 1222 File numbers IMM-5243-01 Decision Content Date: 20031021 Docket: IMM-5243-01 Citation: 2003 FC 1222 Ottawa, Ontario, this 21st day of October, 2003 Present: THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE O'REILLY BETWEEN: CHIKAODILI SARITA OMORUYI AND CHRISTOPHER OSARETIN OMORUYI Applicants and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent REASONS FOR JUDGMENT AND JUDGMENT [1] Chikaodili Omoruyi applied to become a permanent resident of Canada on the strength of her qualifications as a hospital pharmacist. Her application was evaluated by a visa officer at the Canadian High Commission in London, England. The officer awarded her a total of 68 points, just short of the 70 points required for a successful application. The officer awarded her no points for job experience or occupational factors. Ms. Omoruyi argues that the officer's assessment was seriously flawed and asks, by way of this application for judicial review, for a reconsideration of her application by a different officer. [2] I agree with Ms. Omoruyi that the visa officer erred and that she deserves to have her application reconsidered. [3] Ms. Omoruyi stated in her application that she had worked as a hospital pharmacist from August 1998 to September 1999. Similarly, her resume set out her employment history and described her experience working at the Military Hospital Ikoyi in Nigeria during that time period. She also supplied a letter of recommendation from her supervisor at the hospital describing her duties and good employment record. Still, the visa officer found that she did not meet the minimum requirement of one-year's experience in her chosen occupation. [4] The officer appears to have relied on the date on which Ms. Omoruyi received her pharmacist's licence as the starting point of her relevant experience. Starting from that date (June 2000), Ms. Omoruyi had not acquired a full year of experience. However, it appears she had completed more than a year working as a hospital pharmacist before she ever acquired her licence. She was qualified to work as a pharmacist in Nigeria in 1998 based on her bachelor's degree and internship, even though she did not obtain her licence until 2000. [5] Accordingly, I find the visa officer's assessment was out of keeping with the evidence before her. Therefore, I must allow Ms. Omoruyi's application for judicial review and order a reconsideration of her file by a different officer. [6] Neither party proposed a question of general importance for certification, and none is stated. JUDGMENT IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that: 1. The application for judicial review is allowed. 2. Ms. Omoruyi's application shall be reconsidered by a different visa officer. 3. No question of general importance is stated. "James W. O'Reilly" Judge FEDERAL COURT NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD DOCKET: IMM-5243-01 STYLE OF CAUSE: CHIKAODILI SARITA OMORUYI and CHRISTOPHER OSARETIN OMORUYI Applicants and THE MINISTER OF CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION Respondent PLACE OF HEARING: Toronto, Ontario DATE OF HEARING: October 9, 2003 REASONS FOR JUDGMENT and JUDGMENT BY : The Honourable Mr. Justice O'Reilly DATED: October 21, 2003 APPEARANCES: Kingsley I. Jesuorobo FOR THE APPLICANTS John Loncar FOR THE RESPONDENT SOLICITORS OF RECORD: Kingsley I. Jesuorobo Barrister & Solicitor North York, Ontario FOR THE APPLICANTS Morris Rosenberg Deputy Attorney General of Canada FOR THE RESPONDENT
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca