Methamen v. Canada

Methamen v. Canada
Court (s) Database
Federal Court of Appeal Decisions
Date
2005-03-15
Neutral citation
2005 FCA 106
File numbers
A-294-04
Decision Content
Date: 20050315
Docket: A-294-04
Citation: 2005 FCA 106
CORAM: DÉCARY J.A.
LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
NADON J.A.
BETWEEN:
SADOK METHAMEN
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
Hearing held at Montréal, Quebec, on March 15, 2005.
Judgment delivered at Montréal, Quebec, on March 15, 2005.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT BY: LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
Date: 20050315
Docket: A-294-04
Citation: 2005 FCA 106
CORAM: DÉCARY J.A.
LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
NADON J.A.
BETWEEN:
SADOK METHAMEN
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
(Delivered from the bench at Montréal, Quebec, on March 15, 2005.)
LÉTOURNEAU J.A.:
[1] The appellant claimed a child tax benefit for the care and education of his daughter, a minor who suffered from poor health, under sections 122.6 and 122.64 of the Income Tax Act (the Act). Considering the admissions of fact concerning the period in question, to the effect that the child did not reside with the appellant in Canada, Tardif J. had no alternative but to apply the Act and uphold the Minister's determination dismissing the appellant's claim.
[2] As is unfortunately often the case when taxpayers represent themselves before the Tax Court of Canada, the appellant filed evidence before this Court that had not been introduced at trial and therefore could not be admitted in evidence at this late stage: see Ray v. Canada, [2003] F.C.J. No. 1226.
[3] Furthermore, on appeal, the appellant filed an application for compensation that extended beyond both the period involved, that is, effective September 2002, and the scope of the dispute. It is a child tax benefit claim for his son, who has now reached the age of majority, for base taxation years other than 2001, the year invoked for his daughter. We have no jurisdiction to accept the submission of or hear these additional claims.
[4] Under the circumstances, the appeal will be dismissed with costs. However, the formal judgment dated October 23, 2003, will be amended to read as follows:
The appeal against the decision by the Minister of National Revenue to deny the appellant the Canada Child Tax Benefit, effective September 2002, established under sections 122.6 and 122.64 of the Income Tax Act with respect to base taxation year 2001, is dismissed in accordance with the attached Reasons for Judgment.
"Gilles Létourneau"
J.A.
Certified true translation
Michael Palles
FEDERAL COURT OF APPEAL
SOLICITORS OF RECORD
DOCKET: A-294-04
STYLE OF CAUSE: SADOK METHAMEN
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
PLACE OF HEARING: Montréal, Quebec
DATE OF HEARING: March 15, 2005
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT BY: Décary, Létourneau and Nadon JJ.A.
DELIVERED FROM THE BENCH BY: LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
APPEARANCES:
Sadok Methamen
FOR HIMSELF
Nathalie Labbé
FOR THE DEFENDANT
SOLICITORS OF RECORD:
Sadok Methamen
Sousse, Tunisia
FOR HIMSELF
JOHN H. SIMS, Q.C.
Deputy Attorney General of Canada
Montréal, Quebec
FOR THE DEFENDANT
Date: 20050315
Docket: A-294-04
Montréal, Quebec, March 15, 2005
CORAM: DÉCARY J.A.
LÉTOURNEAU J.A.
NADON J.A.
BETWEEN:
SADOK METHAMEN
Appellant
and
HER MAJESTY THE QUEEN
Respondent
JUDGMENT
The appeal is dismissed with costs. The judgment of October 23, 2003 by the Tax Court of Canada is amended to read as follows:
The appeal against the decision by the Minister of National Revenue to deny the appellant the Canada Child Tax Benefit, effective September 2002, established under sections 122.6 and 122.64 of the Income Tax Act with respect to base taxation year 2001, is dismissed in accordance with the attached Reasons for Judgment.
"Robert Décary"
J.A.
Certified true translation
Michael Palles