Interbox Promotion Corporation v. 2428-0414 Québec Inc.
Court headnote
Interbox Promotion Corporation v. 2428-0414 Québec Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2001-06-08 Neutral citation 2001 FCT 616 File numbers T-1788-99 Decision Content Date: 20010608 Docket: T-1788-99 Neutral reference: 2001 FCT 616 BETWEEN: INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION Plaintiff - and - 2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL. Defendants ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FRANÇOIS PILON [1] On April 20, 2001 the plaintiff, through its counsel Daniel Artola, filed its bill of costs pursuant to the judgment by default on March 19, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties. [2] On May 3, 2001 we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the defendant Restaurant-Pub Le Titanic, asking it to submit written comments in opposition to the said bill of costs by May 31, 2001 at the latest. To date no submissions have been received. [3] The assessable services under items 1, 4, 6, 7, 25 and 26 are awarded as submitted, as Mr. Artola chose the minimum number of units for each item. [4] As disbursements the plaintiff submitted an amount of $303.98 for the expenses of investigators specializing in the infringement of intellectual property, as the investigators had to conduct inquiries at the defendant's place of business. [5] I agree with counsel for the plaintiff that these costs were validly incurred in connection with the case at bar. [6] The photocopying and bailiff costs are also awarded. [7] The plaintiff's costs are assessed and allowed in the amou…
Read full judgment
Interbox Promotion Corporation v. 2428-0414 Québec Inc. Court (s) Database Federal Court Decisions Date 2001-06-08 Neutral citation 2001 FCT 616 File numbers T-1788-99 Decision Content Date: 20010608 Docket: T-1788-99 Neutral reference: 2001 FCT 616 BETWEEN: INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION Plaintiff - and - 2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL. Defendants ASSESSMENT OF COSTS - REASONS FRANÇOIS PILON [1] On April 20, 2001 the plaintiff, through its counsel Daniel Artola, filed its bill of costs pursuant to the judgment by default on March 19, 2001 and asked that it be assessed without a personal appearance by the parties. [2] On May 3, 2001 we sent a copy of the bill of costs to the defendant Restaurant-Pub Le Titanic, asking it to submit written comments in opposition to the said bill of costs by May 31, 2001 at the latest. To date no submissions have been received. [3] The assessable services under items 1, 4, 6, 7, 25 and 26 are awarded as submitted, as Mr. Artola chose the minimum number of units for each item. [4] As disbursements the plaintiff submitted an amount of $303.98 for the expenses of investigators specializing in the infringement of intellectual property, as the investigators had to conduct inquiries at the defendant's place of business. [5] I agree with counsel for the plaintiff that these costs were validly incurred in connection with the case at bar. [6] The photocopying and bailiff costs are also awarded. [7] The plaintiff's costs are assessed and allowed in the amounts of $1,150.00 for assessable services and $396.83 for disbursements. A certificate of assessment will be issued in the amount of $1,545.83. (signed) François Pilon Assessment Officer Halifax, Nova Scotia June 8, 2001 Certified true translation Suzanne M. Gauthier, LL.L. Trad. a. FEDERAL COURT OF CANADA TRIAL DIVISION NAMES OF COUNSEL AND SOLICITORS OF RECORD COURT FILE No.: T-1788-99 BETWEEN: INTERBOX PROMOTION CORPORATION Plaintiff - and - 2428-0414 QUÉBEC INC. ET AL. Defendants WRITTEN ASSESSMENT WITHOUT PERSONAL APPEARANCE REASONS OF: François Pilon, Assessment Officer PLACE OF ASSESSMENT: Halifax, Nova Scotia DATE OF REASONS: June 8, 2001 SOLICITORS OF RECORD: McCarthy, Tétrault, solicitors for the plaintiff Montréal, Quebec
Source: decisions.fct-cf.gc.ca